4.9 Power Control

Note: The power control is used only in this section. When considering other sections, the power control feature should be deactivated. 
 A power control feature is implemented within SEAMCAT. When this feature is activated it introduces a variation of the interefering link transmitter power. More details on the implementation of the power control in SEAMCAT is presented in ANNEX 14:. 
 When using the scenario provided in section 3 (Victim Link and Interfering Link operate at the same frequency 1000 MHz but with a interfering link receiver antenna gain should be equal to 11 dBi), it becomes possible to define the distance between the Victim link receiver and the Interefering link transmitter. 
 For simplification, we consider that the Victim link receiver and the Interefering link transmitter are defined using the following assumptions (1 km distance between the Victim and the Interefering link transmitter). This is illustrated in Figure 134. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Figure 134: Setting up the distance between the Interfering and the Victim pair of transmitter and receiver 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 If the power control is not activated then the iRSS unwanted is (see Figure 135): 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
                   

 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Figure 135: iRSS unwanted without power control 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 The same assumption is used for the distance between ILT and the ILR (i.e. x = 0 km and y = 1 km) where the ILT is the (0,0) origin as shown in Figure 136. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Figure 136: Setting up the distance between the Interfering link transmitter and the Interfering link receiver to evaluate the dRSS Interfering link receiver . 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 The power received by the Interfering link receiver (dRSS Interfering link receiver ) is then: 
 
   
 Note:  You should not confuse the dRSS Interfering link receiver and the dRSS Victim link receiver . Figure 111 illustrates their differences. 
 The power control can be input as shown in Figure 137. 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Figure 137: Setting up the power control for the interfering link 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 Using these assumptions, the results of the simulation are the same as previously since the threshold (-35 dBm) is above the dRSS Interfering link receiver  (-37.5 dB). This corresponds to the Case 1 described in ANNEX 14:. 
 Now, if the threshold is decreased from –35 dBm to –50 dBm (see Figure 138) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Figure 138: Reduction of the minimum threshold in the PC 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 Since, the power control feature is activated the gain of the power control is determined according to the guidance given in ANNEX 14: on page 344. Since the dRSS Interfering link receiver is –37.5 dBm and: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
 The gain of the power control ( g it PC ) is 10 dB (Case (i+1) in ANNEX 14:). This means that the iRSS unwanted will be decreased by 10 dB, i.e. : 
 
 Finally, if the threshold is decreased from –50 dBm to –70 dBm, the power control feature is activated. Since the dRSS Interfering link receiver is –37.5 dBm, this results in: 
 
   
 The gain of the power control is 20 dB (Case ( n_step + 2) in ANNEX 14:). This means that the iRSS unwanted will be decreased by 20 dB, i.e. :